Topics
Older StoriesTuesday 12-MaySaturday 09-MaySunday 03-MayMonday 20-AprSunday 15-MarSaturday 07-FebWednesday 28-JanSunday 25-JanTuesday 30-DecWednesday 17-DecEventsThere are no upcoming events |
Welcome to Evilness even Mercer slamed mmp
Authored by: evilscientist onFriday, October 12 2007 @ 01:07 MDT
Actually, the government (and parties) being opposed to PR was part of my point. It is why they choose to pit FPTP against a particular type of PR as opposed to the whole concept of PR in general. Those opposed to PR use the divisions within the PR community to ensure a defeat by putting one particular type of PR against FPTP. All I am suggesting is that a better question would be to ask if people want FPTP or _some_form_ of PR, to be deterimed after the referendum would have a better chance at success than they way the people in favour of the status quo are currently forming the ballot questions. In that way the anti-PR forces can't use the natural divisions within the PR community to ensure a defeat.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
Copyright © 2024 Jason Nishiyama All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Powered by Geeklog Created this page in 0.07 seconds |