Topics
Older StoriesTuesday 12-MaySaturday 09-MaySunday 03-MayMonday 20-AprSunday 15-MarSaturday 07-FebWednesday 28-JanSunday 25-JanTuesday 30-DecWednesday 17-DecEventsThere are no upcoming events |
Welcome to Evilness Terminology alert!
Authored by: evilscientist onTuesday, June 30 2009 @ 07:01 MDT
It is important to remember that the provinces don't count on Ottawa for their power. Their power is specifically mentioned in the constitution and hence they have sovereignty over the areas given to them and the federal government can't do anything to change what the provinces do in these areas. That is what defines a federal state, that the federated units have sovereign power of their own that the federal government can't act in, not the form of representation the federal government uses. So as you say the UK where the UK parliament has devolved some of its power to regional parliaments, but the regional parliaments can have that power taken away by the UK parliament at any time. On the other hand, in Canada for example, what the provinces have exclusive jurisdiction over is outlined in section 92 of the constitution. So for example if Alberta wanted to do away with medicare, it could. All the federal government could do about it is stop sending money for health care as non-marine hospitals are exclusively a provincial power.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
Copyright © 2024 Jason Nishiyama All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Powered by Geeklog Created this page in 0.08 seconds |